Skip to content
MetaOptima · Evidence library

Clinical studies, publications, and supporting  evidence.

 

 

DermEngine, OptimaScan, DermDx and MoleScope  - validated in independent trials.

Last reviewed September, 2026

Direct product study
Skin Health and Disease · 2026 · 10.1093/skinhd/vzag122

Performance of the ‘DermDx’ algorithm in triaging suspected skin cancers: results of the AI-SCSS study

Anderson ADG, Morgan H, Kasaravalli N, et al.

This real-world UK study evaluated MetaOptima’s DermDx AI for triaging 1,024 lesions referred through a suspected skin cancer pathway. DermDx correctly identified 296 of 298 confirmed skin cancers, achieving 99.3% sensitivity for cancer and 98.1% sensitivity for malignant and premalignant lesions combined. The researchers estimated that using DermDx for triage could reduce face-to-face dermatology consultations by 26.7%, while maintaining cancer-detection performance comparable to dermatologists. 

Read the study

Direct product study
The Lancet Digital Health · 2023 · 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00130-9

Comparison of humans versus mobile phone-powered artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and management of pigmented skin cancer in secondary care

Menzies SW, Sinz C, Menzies M, et al.

Multicentre prospective diagnostic clinical trial of MetaOptima’s seven-class AI with mobile dermoscopy: 172 lesions from 124 patients for diagnosis, 5,696 lesions from 66 high-risk patients for management. Diagnostic performance was comparable with specialists and better than novices;

Read the study

Direct product study
JMIR Dermatology · 2022;5(3):e35916 · 10.2196/35916

Experiences of patient-led surveillance, including patient-performed teledermoscopy, in the MEL-SELF pilot RCT

Drabarek D, Habgood E, Janda M, et al.

This qualitative study explored the experiences of 20 melanoma survivors using patient-led surveillance with MoleScope and DermEngine. Participants reported greater awareness of their skin, improved self-examination habits, reassurance, and opportunities for earlier melanoma detection.

Direct product study
JAMA Dermatology · 2022;158(1):33–42 · 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4704

Assessing the potential for patient-led surveillance after treatment of localized melanoma (MEL-SELF): a pilot randomized clinical trial

Ackermann DM, Dieng M, Medcalf E, et al.

This pilot randomized clinical trial including 100 patients found that patient-led surveillance was safe, feasible, and acceptable. Despite limited statistical power to detect effects on secondary outcomes, the intervention appears to improve skin self-examination practice and detection of subsequent new primary melanomas.

Read the study
Direct product study
JEADV · 2024 · 10.1111/jdv.20300

Mobile teledermoscopy for patients at high risk of cutaneous melanoma: a single-arm feasibility study at two tertiary centres (MOBILEMEL)

Martin L, et al.

Product-enabled mobile teledermoscopy feasibility study. The associated conference poster (entry 24) explicitly identifies MoleScope and DermEngine.

 
Direct product study
JMIR Dermatology · 2022;5(4):e40623 · 10.2196/40623

Perspectives and experiences of patient-led melanoma surveillance using digital technologies from clinicians in the MEL-SELF pilot RCT

Drabarek D, Habgood E, Ackermann D, et al.

Interviews with eight clinicians involved in the MoleScope/DermEngine-enabled pilot, covering workflow benefits, trust, workload and implementation concerns.

Company-affiliated research
British Journal of Dermatology · 2018/2019 · 10.1111/bjd.17189

Diagnostic accuracy of content-based dermatoscopic image retrieval with deep classification features

Tschandl P, Argenziano G, Razmara M, Yap J.

MetaOptima funded the work and supplied hardware; 

  • Content‐based image retrieval (CBIR) based on deep features can find visually similar dermatoscopic images.
  • Retrieving only 16 similar images can achieve the same accuracy as a CNN classifier.
  • CBIR can enable a CNN to recognize unknown disease classes in new datasets.
Company-affiliated research
Experimental Dermatology · 2018 · 10.1111/exd.13777

Multimodal skin lesion classification using deep learning

Yap J, Yolland W, Tschandl P.

This study evaluated a deep-learning system that combines dermoscopic and clinical images with patient information to classify skin lesions. Tested on 2,917 cases, the multimodal approach outperformed a system using clinical images alone in both melanoma detection (AUC 0.866 vs. 0.784) and five-class lesion classification. The results also showed that dermoscopic images provided greater diagnostic value than standard clinical photographs, supporting the use of multiple data sources to improve automated skin-lesion assessment

Company-affiliated research
Skin Research and Technology · 2020 · 10.1111/srt.12822

Using content-based image retrieval of dermoscopic images for interpretation and education: a pilot study

Sadeghi M, Chilana P, Yap J, Tschandl P, Atkins MS.

Small pilot with 14 non-medically trained participants evaluating an academic image-retrieval interface. Includes a MetaOptima-affiliated author but is not direct commercial-product validation.

Company-affiliated research
The Lancet Oncology · 2019 · 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30333-X

Comparison of the accuracy of human readers versus machine-learning algorithms for pigmented skin-lesion classification

Tschandl P, Rosendahl C, Kittler H.

Open, web-based international diagnostic study comparing 139 algorithms and 511 human readers, including MetaOptima researchers’ ISIC 2018 submissions.

Company-affiliated research
IEEE/CVF CVPR Workshops · 2021:1829–1836 · 10.1109/CVPRW53098.2021.00202

Can self-training identify suspicious ugly duckling lesions?

Mohseni M, Yap J, Yolland W, Koochek A, Atkins MS.

Peer-reviewed computer-vision conference paper with MetaOptima-affiliated researchers. Reports 72.1% sensitivity and 94.2% diagnostic accuracy on its held-out test set — technical research, not validation of a named marketed product.

Related program
Trials · 2021;22:324 · 10.1186/s13063-021-05231-7

Can patient-led surveillance detect subsequent new primary or recurrent melanomas and reduce routinely scheduled follow-up? MEL-SELF RCT protocol

Ackermann DM, Smit AK, Janda M, et al.

Protocol for the larger MEL-SELF randomized controlled trial.

Related program
JMIR Dermatology · 2023;6:e45865 · 10.2196/45865

Acceptability of a hypothetical reduction in routinely scheduled clinic visits among patients with a history of localized melanoma (MEL-SELF)

Drabarek D, Ackermann D, Medcalf E, Bell KJL.

Pilot randomized clinical trial sub-study on patient acceptability of reduced clinic follow-up.

Related program
JMIR Dermatology · 2024;7:e58136 · 10.2196/58136

Participant motivators and expectations in the MEL-SELF randomized clinical trial: content analysis of survey responses

Ackermann D, Hersch J, Jordan D, et al.

Content analysis of why participants join patient-led surveillance and what they expect from it.

Related program
JAMA Dermatology · 2026;162(5):457–468 · 10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.0083

Characteristics of participants screened and randomized to the Melanoma Self Surveillance trial

Medcalf E, Ackermann DM, Williams JTW, et al.

Secondary analysis of 504 randomized participants. Describes the intervention as including a mobile dermatoscope and teledermatologist assessment.

Related program
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · 2026 · 10.1177/1357633X261457782

Experiences of patient-led melanoma surveillance and teledermatology in underserved groups: a qualitative sub-study

Kharel P, Medcalf E, Ackermann D, et al.

Implementation evidence from the larger MEL-SELF program.

Conference / preprint
Conference poster · 2017

Teledermatology and teledermoscopy as tools to help general practitioners in effective e-triage of suspicious skin lesions

Claveau J, Faure MP, Bordeleau J, et al.

Direct MoleScope and DermEngine e-triage study involving 23 GPs. The final poster reports 292 patients, 10 melanomas, 12 basal cell carcinomas and 10 squamous cell carcinomas, with dermatologist access reduced from 1–12 months to 14–90 days.

Conference / preprint
British Journal of Dermatology · 2021;185(Suppl 1):179 · 10.1111/bjd.20367

BT08: Assessment of three different dermoscopy imaging systems during a fast-track skin cancer clinic

Tanna P, Murray C, Ardern-Jones L, et al.

Independent conference abstract comparing Heine Delta 20T, MoleScope II and Dino-Lite Edge across 23 lesions. MoleScope II scored lower on mean image quality but was comparable for diagnostic ability and was the most mobile, lowest-cost system evaluated.

Conference / preprint
Preliminary report of entry 1

AI-SCSS EADV abstract and poster — real-world performance of a commercial deep neural network algorithm in a UK suspected skin cancer pathway

EADV conference reporting

Preliminary counts differ from the final paper because of later exclusions and 12-month follow-up.

Conference / preprint
Australasian Journal of Dermatology · 10.1111/ajd.14495

One million skin checks: a feasibility study of teledermatology and AI in general practice

Conference oral abstract

Appears linked to ACTRN12623000275662 (entry 12); the product connection is established through the registry, not the abstract alone.

Conference / preprint
arXiv:2104.07819 · 2021 · preprint

Out-of-distribution detection for dermoscopic image classification

Mohseni M, Yap J, Yolland W, Razmara M, Atkins MS.

Technical preprint on detecting novel or out-of-distribution dermoscopic disease classes.

Secondary evidence
10.1038/s41746-024-01103-x

A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence versus clinicians for skin-cancer diagnosis

npj Digital Medicine · 2024

Includes the 2019 Tschandl human-versus-algorithm study and identifies MetaOptima in the evidence tables.

Read the study

Secondary evidence
10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.0217

Prospective evidence on artificial intelligence–assisted melanoma diagnostics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

JAMA Dermatology · 2026

Includes the Menzies 2023 study and identifies the evaluated AI group as “MetaOptima; 7-class.” Appropriate secondary evidence, but not a separate DermDx validation.